So He thinks that Ayatollah ali Khameini is "concerned" about the violent election dispute in Iran, and He "worries" when he sees freedom fighters being met with violence. So what?
Where is the vehement statement that this country supports all people who desire freedom? Reagan and the Bushes would have made statements in support of the Iranian protestors in no uncertain terms. Even Clinton might have stepped up.
But we are stuck with President "deeply concerned" Milquetoast. He just wants to be liked. He's good at being liked, but He has a wish-bone instead of a backbone.
And perhaps He identifies with a government that keeps the populace in check by any means. So why "meddle"?
Tuesday, June 16, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)